Comparison

Self-hosted Grafana or managed Linux monitoring?

Self-hosting Grafana can be the right choice when you need complete control. Nova is for teams that want Linux host monitoring coverage without owning the operational work behind Grafana, collectors, logs, metrics, tenants, and alerts.

Choose self-hosted
When platform control and custom pipelines matter most
Choose Nova
When fast Linux host coverage and managed operations matter most
Nova scope
Focused Linux host monitoring, not every observability use case
Beta support
Staff-assisted rollout with scope confirmed directly

When self-hosted Grafana makes sense

Self-hosting Grafana and the surrounding observability stack is a strong fit for teams that need deep platform control, custom data pipelines, custom dashboards, unusual retention policies, strict internal infrastructure rules, or broad telemetry beyond Linux host monitoring.

The tradeoff is ownership. Someone must run and upgrade the stack, manage Grafana organizations and roles, maintain collection configs, operate metrics and log storage, route tenant data, and respond when the monitoring system itself has problems.

When managed monitoring makes sense

Managed monitoring is a better fit when the first priority is reliable host visibility rather than building an observability platform. Nova handles the common platform work and keeps the V1 scope focused on Linux hosts, Grafana dashboards, metrics, logs, and alerts.

That narrower scope is intentional. Nova is not the right answer if your immediate requirement is Windows monitoring, Kubernetes monitoring, traces, arbitrary Alloy pipelines, or fully custom Grafana environments.

What Nova removes from your workload

Nova removes the setup and maintenance work around tenant creation, collector enrollment, remote configuration, Grafana organization mapping, OIDC role claims, Mimir and Loki routing, and baseline host dashboards.

For teams that simply need Linux hosts monitored quickly, that can be more valuable than owning every layer of the stack.

  • No Grafana organization setup for each tenant.
  • No from-scratch Alloy config design for V1 host monitoring.
  • No separate identity and role mapping process in Grafana.
  • No need to operate Mimir and Loki routing for the supported beta scope.